Michael, I think the best way to handle the coordination is in two steps. I'd like to get my Linux-clone changes in first (you should review, I will commit) and then we switch hats and I will review your Solaris changes. It seems best to do this in two steps: to better place blame when it breaks (this is very tricky stuff to get right). If you agree, please review my posted changes.
Aside: Instead of griping about the missing execvpe, I filed a bug against glibc, and was surprised to find that Ulrich Drepper had implemented it a couple of days later. It will probably be in glibc-2.11. Perhaps in 5 years we can use it ourselves...). Thanks, Uli! Martin On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 07:29, Michael McMahon <[email protected]>wrote: > Martin, > > I had done something similar with clone & exec for Linux, but hadn't got > round to testing it. > So, it seems reasonable to take yours. Do you want to send me your updated > versions of > process_md.c and the test? I can take care of the merge with the Solaris > code.
