Much thanks, Martin, to rub my eyes.

I'm successive with Cygwin to run awk scripts on Windows, but there is no library for ksh (Kern Shell) :-( MKS should be part of "Windows Services for UNIX", see <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korn-Shell>:

Die /MKS Korn shell/ ist eine weitere kommerzielle ksh-Implementierung. Sie ist Bestandteil von Microsofts <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft> Windows Services for UNIX <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_Services_for_UNIX> (SFU) sowie dem Subsystem für UNIX-basierte Anwendungen (SUA) der Windows Vista <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_Vista> Enterprise und Ultimate Editionen.

But maybe nobody has ever tried to run webrev under MKS.

-Ulf



Am 17.07.2009 03:49, Martin Buchholz schrieb:
The webrev script was developed by Sun developers for use on Solaris.
Use on Windows is unsupported.
You are not likely to find much support on this mailing list for
doing jdk development on windows, and especially not using
Microsoft "Windows Services for UNIX".
Sun engineers use Cygwin or MKS for creating a Unixoid
environment on Windows (but's it's still painful).

Martin

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 18:23, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de <mailto:ulf.zi...@gmx.de>> wrote:

    Am 16.07.2009 15:57, Andrew John Hughes schrieb:


        I think configuring the PATH on Windows is a little outside
        the scope
        of this mailing list and there are plenty of sources for such
        information elsewhere.

    Maybe you are right.

    But my question is not, how to set a path on Windows, it's how the
    webrev script interoperates with paths, defined on Windows.
    I have set the path to to the 'hg.exe' on Windows, but webrev
    script doesn't find it.

    I've also posted my question to the Microsoft "Windows Services
    for UNIX" forum, but I'm afraid, that people there don't know how
    to interpret webrev's error message.

    So where to find people developing inside JDK under Windows
    (additionally having knowledge about webrev script)?

    Sorry, being inconvenient here,

    -Ulf



Reply via email to