On 09/02/2009 11:27 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 01:07, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de 
<mailto:ulf.zi...@gmx.de>> wrote:
    Am 02.09.2009 05:21, Martin Buchholz schrieb:
    On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 01:29, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de
    <mailto:ulf.zi...@gmx.de>> wrote:

    {...@code is now the preferred way.  I tried to modify the methods I
    changed,
    but didn't try to change the whole file.

    You also have added old style, so I asked why you have mixed it:

    /**
    - * The minimum value of a Unicode surrogate code unit in the UTF-16
    encoding.
    + * The minimum value of a Unicode surrogate code unit in the
    + * UTF-16 encoding, constant <code>'&#92;uD800'</code>.
    *
    * @since 1.5
    */
    public static final char MIN_SURROGATE = MIN_HIGH_SURROGATE;

I would have used {...@code here if I could figure out
how to make it work
("&#92" shows up literally in the generated output).

Why not just do {...@code \uD800}? I'm like 60% sure that would work just fine. :-)

- DML

Reply via email to