Cosmetics for class Character is finished (there have been javadoc
errors in String+AbstractStringbuilder too):
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/attachment.cgi?id=145&action=diff
-Ulf
Am 03.09.2009 21:51, Ulf Zibis schrieb:
Am 03.09.2009 20:10, Martin Buchholz schrieb:
I agree that the spec can be clarified.
Another case is the similar
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/String.html#replace(char,
char)
which states "Returns a new string", but then goes on to contradict
itself,
although the meaning is clear.
Webrev please.
Martin,
I was in the assumption, that you could add this clarification to your
CR as you are involved anyway on finishing the javadoc of String. As
you may be know, webrev script is a pain for me, as I'm on Windows.
CYGWIN is buggy in that case, so each 2nd time I try this, Windows
comes to hang because of C heap overflow.
I like to finish the Character class and file the changes via patch on
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net. So I would be happy If you could answer
my question, if replacing all occurrences of <code>...</code> by
{...@code ...} using \u005CuXXXX is secure.
-Ulf
