Jason Mehrens wrote:
+1, return empty string for the one arg and add the two arg
variant. The j.u.Properties.getProperty(String, String) could use it
first. Just curious, what does project jigsaw think of j.u.Objects?
I'm preparing the first round of java.util.Objects with the
single-argument static toString method return "null" for null for final
review. I'll send out a few follow-up emails, including one for
additional toStrings methods. I'm sympathetic to the two-argument
toString method with a default.
Project Jigsaw is about modularity so I don't see what connection there
is between Jigsaw and j.u.Objects.
-Joe
Jason
> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:47:49 +0100
> Subject: Objects.toString [Re: What methods should go into a
java.util.Objects class in JDK 7?]
> From: scolebou...@joda.org
> To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
>
> A number of us are proposing that Objects.toString(obj) should return
> "" when the object is null. I'm strongly in favour of this, and it
> removes any discussion of duplicated API (as it does something
> different and more useful).
>
> In favour/against +1/-1 ?
>
> Stephen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/>
