On 01/29/2010 02:02 AM, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:
In my previous post I discussed choice criteria for performance
enhancements in math libraries.

I guess that in production projects Jdk 1.6 and Jdk 1.7 the main choice
criteria is stability.
This explains why changes to math stuff in Java are almost impossible.
Here is a pair of examples:
1) The Karatsuba multiplication in BigInteger
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2008-January/000225.html

I'm the submitter of these patches which are almost two years old in a couple of weeks, with still no approval. And these multiplication patches are only a small part of the work that needs to be done on BigInteger. I also have orders-of-magnitude improvements for pow() and toString(), both of which use extremely slow algorithms. I was asked to make patches as small as possible so they could be reviewed quickly, so my submitted patches have just been for multiplication.

Joe Darcy, what is your current status on reviewing these patches? Can you delegate this to Dmitry or Xiaobin if you don't appear to have time to do it?

I respect our "Java Floating-Point Czar" for keeping stability of
mainstream Java.
However, I suspect that some OpenJdk users prefer enhancements and bug
fixes of old bugs in math libraries in exchange for a small risk of
> new bugs.

I think OpenJDK *contributors* need some evidence that their contributions are being looked at, or they'll stop contributing, and/or move to other platforms with better numerics. Some of us have spent literally weeks of unpaid work improving performance, getting world-class outside reviewers to look over them and reduce Sun's workload, etc. It's very depressing to wait over two years for approval of a well-known algorithm that is usually assigned as a homework assignment in undergrad courses.

What about more rapid enhancement of OpenJdk math in some project
related to but separate from OpenJDK 6 and (Open) JDK 7 ?
This may be a new Math project or a subproject of the Da Vinci Machine
Project.

I'm all for improving Java's numerics. Please keep me informed. I've already implemented a lot of missing algorithms.

--
  Alan Eliasen
  [email protected]
  http://futureboy.us/

Reply via email to