Am 10.03.2010 00:22, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 15:11, Ulf Zibis<ulf.zi...@gmx.de> wrote:Can you explain the mystery about "+ 2" ?It's exactly the same as the old resizing behavior.
In detail I meant, if you have any idea, why the original designers could have chosen the "+1". The code would be smarter, if ommited, + would serve the algorithm-loved arrays of [base-2-] "round" sizes.
-Ulf
