On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 13:36, Ulf Zibis <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 16.03.2010 21:28, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
> Sorry, I'm still not convinced for the surrogate testing methods. > Almost all chars are less than MIN_SURROGATE, so you have to beat > the already amazingly cheap > x >= MIN_SURROGATE. > > > Good point, but ... > ... what about : > 6933327 - Use shifted addressing modes instead of shift instuctions > and internal review ID of 1735166 Although I do worry about what hotspot will do with my bytecode (as you know), I mostly try to think more abstractly about the JIT and simply produce high-quality JIT-friendly bytecode. Your considerations in 6933327 seem valuable, but are targeted at only one runtime compiler, on only one machine architecture. Martin
