Am 20.03.2010 01:13, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
We can do it for free by switching => isValidCodePoint, so why not?
Don't you think we should add a hint to javadoc to inform the user about the implementation difference between isSupplementaryCodePoint and isValidCodePoint?
It's likely, the user would use isBMPCodePoint and isSupplementaryCodePoint as pair, not knowing about the performance problem.
But more I would like to see 6932837 && 6935994 gets fixed, so we could stay on conservative style.
-Ulf
