Wow, that's indeed much better, than my simple whitespace correction.
Looks good. I guess the doc corrections are still in process. My old patch may help to locate them: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/attachment.cgi?id=146 -Ulf Am 26.03.2010 00:37, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
Hi Masayoshi and Ulf, I'd like you to do a code review. There are actual doc bugs in the specification of the surrogate unicode blocks. Ulf convinced me that we should use U+ notation for Unicode blocks. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/UnicodeBlock/ Martin
