Hi!

Do you mean, it would be good to have a "standard" implementing class of the 
interface Map.Entry<K,V> ?
This does exist: AbstractMap.SimpleEntry<K,V>. Well, of course both the 
interface and the class are
somewhat 'hidden', but nevertheless, they do exist.



30.03.10, 16:08, "Weijun Wang" <weijun.w...@sun.com>:

> Hi All
>  
>  There are multiple CRs asking for a java.util.Pair class:
>  
>     4983155
>     6229146
>     4947273
>  
>  I know such a simple thing can be made very complex and everyone might want 
> to add a new method into it. How about we just make it most primitive? Simply 
> an immutable and Serializable class, two final fields, one constructor, two 
> getters (?), and no static factory methods. (S)he who does the real 
> implementation has the privilege to choose between head/tail and car/cdr.
>  
>  Thanks
>  Max
>  
>  
>  

-- 
Здесь спама нет http://mail.yandex.ru/nospam/sign

Reply via email to