Hi! Do you mean, it would be good to have a "standard" implementing class of the interface Map.Entry<K,V> ? This does exist: AbstractMap.SimpleEntry<K,V>. Well, of course both the interface and the class are somewhat 'hidden', but nevertheless, they do exist.
30.03.10, 16:08, "Weijun Wang" <weijun.w...@sun.com>: > Hi All > > There are multiple CRs asking for a java.util.Pair class: > > 4983155 > 6229146 > 4947273 > > I know such a simple thing can be made very complex and everyone might want > to add a new method into it. How about we just make it most primitive? Simply > an immutable and Serializable class, two final fields, one constructor, two > getters (?), and no static factory methods. (S)he who does the real > implementation has the privilege to choose between head/tail and car/cdr. > > Thanks > Max > > > -- Здесь спама нет http://mail.yandex.ru/nospam/sign