Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 03.09.2010 12:31, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
I think the question of variable types belongs to the spec, but here
in Object class's javadoc we should speak about objects. So I now
suggest:
"...and that the returned object of the {...@code clone} method of an
array object of class {...@code T[]} is of class {...@code T[]} where T is
any [raw]? reference or primitive class. See java language
specification version 3, section 6.4.5"
And additionally 2 cents: As T is often used for parameter type in
context with generics, I think, X would leed to less misinterpretation
and would match better to the according spec.
I think the text as suggested by Martin with the explicit definition of
T is sufficiently clear as-is.
-Joe
