On 05/01/11 11:23, Alan Bateman wrote:
Hi maurizio,
In my opinion, XlintWarn should also test invokeGeneric().
Moreover, it will be better to have one test by invoke*() instead of
having one
test for all invoke*()
Rémi
Hi Remi
I agree on your comments; however note that the aim of the XlintWarn
test is to check that the compiler issues warnings in relation to
old-style usage of 292 target typing - since the old syntax is going
away (see related cleanup CR: 6992698). In other words, the aim of this
changeset is to make tests pass again (with b123) awaiting for a more
precise cleanup (which is needed since InvokeDynamic and other 292
features should be removed from the JDK 7 repo).
Maurizio
