On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Joshua Bloch <j...@google.com> wrote:
> I like the name *nonNull*. All other things being equal, shorter is > better. I've used the name *nonNull* for a few years, and it's feels > right. To my mind, *requireNonNull* does a worse job of suggesting that > the method returns its argument. +1 for nonNull. While it's implemented as a method, I think of it more as a keyword-like modifier, in which case an adjective works better than a verb phrase. Bob
