On Mar 15 2011, at 02:36 , Steve Poole wrote: > On 14/03/11 21:02, Mike Duigou wrote: >> I've gotten feedback regarding this issue and I've updated the webrev to use >> the commented out compare(key, key) test rather than the previously >> committed solution. I hadn't looked at the commented out code too carefully >> and had assumed it was pseudo-code rather than an actual solution. It's an >> improvement over the original solution and reads, to me and apparently >> others, a lot simpler. >> > Hi - can you post the feedback to the mailing list?
Hi Steve; Sorry, I can't repost them. I'd have preferred that the feedback went to the list but for whatever reasons the two respondents chose to send the feedback privately and I won't repost their private emails. (They are certainly welcome to do so if they feel it matters). Perhaps it was just a case of "Reply to Sender" vs "Reply to All". I don't know. To summarize the messages though, "Just use the commented out code for 504517. It's better than the old patch." Mike >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/5045147/1/webrev/ >> >> Also now included is a jtreg unit test. >> >> Mike >
