Am 19.04.2011 10:14, schrieb Alan Bateman:
Given that it now only defines the constants for the standard charsets then I think the new name
is better, although with static import then it might not matter too much.
I'm not sure whether we should use this in the zip code as we don't want this to causes the lesser
used charsets to be loaded. It might be worth double checking the startup.
+1
So the use cases for those charset constants minimize against zero.
As written before, I more prefer canonical name constants.
-Ulf
