David Holmes wrote:
On 3/09/2011 9:19 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Modified as suggested to use Arrays.copyOf before being pushed.
The performance team recommend to me this class of change be
implemented so
I assume (and hope) the VM properly handles small arrays in a
performance
sense.
I was going to ask about performance here. Of course we should be
using arraycopy and copyOf et al and if there are performance issues
they should be fixed in those libraries, but in reality ...
I assume we have some performance benchmarks for BigInteger?
The SPECJBB benchmarks involved BigDecimal, which in turn uses
BigInteger (some of the time).
In any case, I think the revised code is clearer than the explicit loops.
-Joe
