Mark, in comparison to the other JEPs proposed recently, this seems quite vague. There is a brief list of candidate collections nestled in the very middle of the JEP, but that's it. Given that the "alternative collection libraries" have existed for many years, it seems to me the author has enough material to draw from to pull up a more concrete list. If the JEP does not wish to list all of them, then I think the JEP should describe what what will drive the selection - a survey? A general request for suggestions? Automated analysis of large codebases?
A friendly community member, Patrick On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/108 > > - Mark >
