On 25/10/2011 01:21, Lana Steuck wrote:
To: TL and Awt teams
What: we have a jcheck conflict in jdk8/tl/jdk and jdk8/awt/jdk repos:
same Bugid # 7100054 used in two different changesets (one in
tl/jdk, the other in awt/jdk repo)
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/f218e6bdf1e8
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c3da0672a882
neil.richa...@ngmr.net
7100054: (porting) Native code should include fcntl.h and unistd.h
rather than sys/fcntl.h and sys/unistd.h
Summary: Use POSIX defined includes for unistd.h and fcntl.h
I think I may be partly to blame here. Neil did ask whether he needed a
separate CR for the AWT change and I told him ([1]) that one was
sufficient. I didn't realize he was thinking of splitting the changes
though as there wasn't any real need to do this for this.
-Alan
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2011-October/007926.html
