So you have a review from me.
I think you need to send this CR/webrev and request for approval to the
jdk7u-...@openjdk.java.net alias for 7u4
Or did you do that already? Hopefully we can fix this drop stuff before
12/12/12 and the end of the world. 8^{
-kto
On Dec 30, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Joe Wang wrote:
> On 12/30/2011 6:14 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 28/12/2011 17:18, Joe Wang wrote:
>>> Kelly asked for 6-open and jdk8 as well. Since we're changing the jaxp
>>> bundle process, we thought we would do the same for 6-open and jdk8 once
>>> this works out. But we can take the change to jdk8 first if this is
>>> approved. The only question I had was that the jdk8 modularization would
>>> change the jaxp source structure. But Kelly thought that's not a problem.
>>> I guess we don't mind another big changeset :)
>> I think it's too early to know if modularization will require the jaxp
>> source code to be restructured as modules. It would clearly be desirable, in
>> particular if jaxp migrates completely. However, if there are still activity
>> upstream (you mentioned monitoring comm...@jaxp-sources.java.net) or some
>> need to keep the 7u and 8 code in sync then it would complicate things a bit.
> Yeh, there are several undecided factors affecting jaxp project/source right
> now. If there's no absolute requirement for a jaxp update in jdk8, I would
> prefer we wait a couple of weeks for things to settle.
>
> -Joe
>
>>
>> -Alan
