Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?
2011/12/2 David Holmes <[email protected]>: > <Added core-libs-dev to the cc list> > > > On 2/12/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote: >> >> I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams. >> I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though. > > > My concern is that there are a number of platform specific changes being > made to java.* and javax.* classes (there are changes to sun.* as well but > that is less of a concern). > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7113349/4/jdk7u-osx/modified/ > > I would hope that we could find a way to not have to make platform specific > changes to such classes, and we need to be sure that the proposed changes do > not impact other platforms either in terms of functionality or performance. > > Thanks, > David > > >> Paul >> >> On 12/1/11 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote: >>> >>> On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Kelly, >>>>> >>>>> Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which >>>>> is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure >>>>> will be yet >>>>> for the push into jdk7u-dev. >>>> >>>> >>>> There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's >>>> different from >>>> the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for >>>> approval first, >>>> someone (i.e. either me or Edvard) needs to approve it, then the push >>>> can happen >>>> - regardless whether that's jdk7u-dev or jdk7u-osx. >>> >>> >>> All the osx porting work is being discussed on the macosx-port-dev >>> mailing list. Most core-libs subscribers will not be on that list >>> (including me - which means my cc to that list will either bounce or >>> get held up). There are proposed changes to core Java classes that >>> should be explicitly reviewed and approved by the core-libs folk in my >>> opinion. >>> >>> David
