Darryl,
 
Per the SortedSet docs: .....null if this set uses the natural ordering of its 
elements.
Per the NavigableSet.descendingSet docs: "The returned set has an ordering 
equivalent to Collections.reverseOrder(comparator())"
 
=====================================
NavigableSet<String> fwd = new TreeSet<String>();
NavigableSet<String> rev = fwd.descendingSet();
System.out.println(fwd.comparator() +" "+ rev.comparator());
=====================================
null java.util.Collections$ReverseComparator@4b71bbc9
 
I don't think the spec allows 'null' to mean reverse natural ordering and 
natural ordering.
 
Jason
 

 

> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:18:55 -0800
> From: darryl.mo...@oracle.com
> To: jason_mehr...@hotmail.com
> CC: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Code Review Request Bug #7129185:(coll) Please add 
> Collections.emptyNavigableSet()
> 
> emptyNavigableSet().descendingSet().comparator() returns null. Isn't 
> this what's expected? The bounds checking should be correct.
> 
> Darryl
                                          

Reply via email to