Hi Mike,

I finally got back to this. These fixes look pretty good and knock off 100+ additional warnings! I've filed bug 7143230 [1] to track this. I took a look through the code and I took the liberty of fixing up a few very minor things:

1. Removed unnecessary casts to ZipEntry in JarVerifier.java, suggested by Chirs Hegarty [2]. (These aren't strictly redundant casts, and don't cause warnings, as the origin types are <? extends ZipEntry> and JarEntry. However, they are unnecessary.)

2. Fixed typo in unrelated comment at line 50 in SignatureFile.java that I happened to notice.

3. Removed parentheses from expressions in MemoryMonitor.java lines 216, 219 which are now unnecessary since the cast has been removed.

No need to issue another patch; I'll just include these changes when I push the changeset.

Which brings me to the topic that we discussed before when I pushed LJC's previous round of warnings fixes, that is, how the Contributed-by line in the commit message should be formatted. (See [3] for the requirements.) For reference, here's what the changeset comment for the previous set of LJC fixes ended up looking like:


changeset:   4802:4f0f9f9c4892
user:        smarks
date:        Wed Dec 07 12:12:50 2011 -0800
description:
7117249: fix warnings in java.util.jar, .logging, .prefs, .zip
Reviewed-by: alanb, dholmes, forax, sherman, smarks
Contributed-by: Prasannaa <[email protected]>, Martijn Verburg <[email protected]>, Goerge_Albrecht <[email protected]>, Graham Allan <[email protected]>, Michael Barker <[email protected]>


It looks like a different set of people contributed to this round of fixes. If you could send me the list of names and email addresses, I can format them into the commit message and push the fix.

Thanks!

s'marks


[1] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7143230

[2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2012-February/000715.html

[3] http://openjdk.java.net/guide/producingChangeset.html

On 2/4/12 12:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Thanks for this, looks great.

Good to see JarVerifier getting some much needed TLC.

-Chris.


On 02/ 4/12 07:50 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
I see Rémi has suggested a slice& dice but I think that's a bit too much
work for the changes involved. Instead I would suggest a simple split, send
the AWT/Printing/Beans changes to awt-dev + 2d-dev, and everything else to
core-libs-dev.

Attached is the patch that contains "everthing else" from LJC warning
fixes hack session.

Mike.

Reply via email to