On 02/14/2012 05:20 PM, Jeff Hain wrote:
Indeed "exact" can be understood as "mathematically exact", and it's
concise. The main problem I see with "exact" is if wanting to add some
non-throwing version afterwards: it should have a close but different
name, and I don't see how if using "xxxExact". But if such methods
shall never be added, it's all right.
The methods would not be added, these methods are introduced *to* throw
exceptions.
The normal Java Language operators { *, +, -, (int) } are used if no
exceptions are needed.
