Hi Sean,

I think this looks good.  ship it :-)

Best
Lance
On Jun 25, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Sean Coffey wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking for a code review around the following corba changes. It turns 
> out that we've a few bug fixes in corba area for jdk6 that were never forward 
> ported to jdk7 or 8. The port is pretty much identical to what was used in 
> JDK6. Some formatting and diamond operator changes introduced but that's 
> about it. There were a few bug fixes to follow up on regressions around the 
> initial fix but this umbrella port should cover all issues.
> 
> The initial bugs fixes were fixed under the "jets" category in the bug tool 
> and that category entered read only mode over a year ago. Hence the 
> requirement for a new bug ID.
> 
> The main bug fix is 6725987 which is an issue where references to the ORB 
> were being kept after ORB.destroy was called.
> 
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7162902
> An accompanying CNCtx fix in JDK repo is also made to correct an issue where 
> the java.naming.corba.orb system property wasn't used correctly. (CR 6893617)
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6893617
> 
> Corba testsuites run and no issues seen. I've also run some JCK testing and 
> saw no issues.
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.7162902.jdk8/ (corba)
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.6893617.jdk8/ (jdk)
> 
> The corba codebase code formatting seems to vary quite a bit. I've 
> reformatted in a small number of areas but the whole corba repo probably 
> warrants it's own clean up project at a later date.
> 
> regards,
> Sean.


Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com

Reply via email to