Hello Max,

Thanks a lot for review, here's the updated patch,

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7163483_5/

On 07/10/2012 08:54 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi Jonathon

This is better. Two minor comments, you can decide what to do or we can see what core-lib-devs think:

I was proposing my solution for this issue and I'd like to hear more from core-lib-devs list. :)


1. Current output uses "zzz" for timezones, you're using "ZZZ". It might be more of an ISO flavor.

Changed to "zzz" format which seems to be more readable for me.


2. The DateFormat.format(Date,StringBuffer,FilePosition) is quite advanced. If it's me, I'll use the simpler format(Data) method.

Updated in the new patch.


Since the jar command also uses the same output format, can you also make the same change there (that's sun.tools.jar.Main) and ask core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net for a review? Sherman (xueming.s...@oracle.com) owns the jar tool.
I've included sun.tools.jar.Main in the latest patch and CCed Sherman.

Could you please help to take another look?

Many thanks

Jonathan


Thanks
Max


On 07/09/2012 03:24 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Max,

Thanks for reviewing.

On 07/06/2012 06:27 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi Jonathan

I have these questions:

1. Why always CAPITAL letters for month and weekday?

This is a fault of the patch, which can be easily fixed by updating the
format string.


2. Why always "dd HH:mm:ss zzz yyyy" for the rest? Some locales uses
"." instead of ":" as times delimiters.
3. Why always dd after MMM? Some locales prefer dd before MMM.

For question #2 and #3, I was just trying to follow the original format
of Date.toString().


Well, if you really think the current "Fri Jul" output is too English,
instead of localizing the string, how about we de-localize it totally
and choose a neutral format?

There are several flavors of ISO date/time format at

  http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime

or we can just choose

  YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss zzz

Good idea, how about a patch in this way?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7163483_4/

And I prefer to your format since it looks more readable to me.

Thanks and best regards!
Jonathan


BTW, the jar command is using the same format, therefore I'm adding
core-libs-dev.

Thanks
Max


On 07/06/2012 05:16 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hello Max,

I's been a long time since my last mail, I did some investigation and
had some discussion with i18n developers, but still did not see a nice
solution for the alignment problem. There does not seem be an existing
API to do this job in JDK scope. So I implemented a simple format
function, and use it to format under different locales.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7163483_3/

The patch is trying to format the code in the same way as
java.util.Date.toString() in the format of "EEE MMM dd HH:mm:ss zzz
yyyy", except for using names of month and DOW in localized format. So
far, it works good for me under all supported locales.

Here's a test case to verify the vertical alignment, which I has been
posted to i18n mailing list before,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/VerticalAlignmentTest.java

It may still fail under "vi_VN" locale with this solution due to test
case limit, but I do not think it is a real failure since the result
fields still get aligned except for multiple words in one field.

Could you please take a look at the patch?

Many thanks & best regards
Jonathan

On 04/25/2012 07:48 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi Jonathan

I'm using English.

In your test all the files have a similar modified time so you cannot
see the difference. However, in my example, you can see that the
widths for date and hour are not zero-padded so the width can be
either 1 or 2.

French is even worse

smk       76 10 nov. 2009 08:57:54 bin/vbin/go
smk     1149 8 avr. 2012 16:03:20 bin/vbin/netbeans
smk      170 20 nov. 2009 16:47:42 bin/vbin/syncdown
smk      671 8 févr. 2012 20:11:22 bin/vbin/ssh.desktop
smk      187 20 nov. 2009 16:47:34 bin/vbin/syncsf

So here even the width of month abbr can be different.

Thanks
Max


On 04/25/2012 07:09 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hello Max,

Terribly sorry for my misunderstanding!

On 04/25/2012 05:39 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:


On 04/25/2012 05:23 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Max,

On 04/25/2012 05:12 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:


On 04/25/2012 03:28 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Weijun,

Thanks for your time, I've updated the webrev, could you please
take a
look?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7163483_2/

On 04/24/2012 03:06 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi Jonathan

Some comments:

1. Can you be sure that the new format always has the same
length?
jarsigner tries to output in a tabular style and each column
should be
aligned.

I'm not sure of that, so the test case was updated to compare the
first
several tokens to determine whether there's any differences in the
expression of date time.

Sorry, I didn't make myself clear last time, I was mainly afraid of
unaligned lines that make the output ugly.

For example:

smk 76 Nov 10, 2009 8:57:54 AM bin/vbin/go
smk 1149 Apr 8, 2012 4:03:20 PM bin/vbin/netbeans
smk 170 Nov 20, 2009 4:47:42 PM bin/vbin/syncdown
smk 671 Feb 8, 2012 8:11:22 PM bin/vbin/ssh.desktop
smk 187 Nov 20, 2009 4:47:34 PM bin/vbin/syncsf


I think that would not be a problem in the new test case which
compares
tokenized strings splited by blank spaces instead of String#equals.
Does
that make sense?

I'm not talking about the test. It's the output of jarsigner looking
ugly.

smk 76 Nov 10, 2009 8:57:54 AM bin/vbin/go
smk 1149 Apr 8, 2012 4:03:20 PM bin/vbin/netbeans
smk 170 Nov 20, 2009 4:47:42 PM bin/vbin/syncdown
smk 671 Feb 8, 2012 8:11:22 PM bin/vbin/ssh.desktop
smk 187 Nov 20, 2009 4:47:34 PM bin/vbin/syncsf

Compare with the current output:

smk 76 Tue Nov 10 08:57:54 CST 2009 bin/vbin/go
smk 1149 Sun Apr 08 16:03:20 CST 2012 bin/vbin/netbeans
smk 170 Fri Nov 20 16:47:42 CST 2009 bin/vbin/syncdown
smk 671 Wed Feb 08 20:11:22 CST 2012 bin/vbin/ssh.desktop
smk 187 Fri Nov 20 16:47:34 CST 2009 bin/vbin/syncsf

I did not see unaligned format in my testing, did you get these
unaligned output after applying the patch? From above lines, I see the
starting indices of date string in each line are always the same,
which
is achieved by jarsigner, but the length of the date strings are
not the
same, which locale were you testing on?


Thanks
Max


Thanks
Max



2. You might need to reformat the modified line to make it fit
into 80
characters width.

3. Why not include the test inside the changeset?
2, 3 were done in the new patch

Thanks
Max


On 04/23/2012 05:46 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hello security-dev,

Here's a patch for bug 7163483, could anybody please help to
take a
look?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/7163483/

The problem is that command "jarsigner -verify -verbose my.jar"
does not
format date string according to current locale. following simple
test
case can be used to disclose this problem.

/*
* Copyright (c) 2012 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be
useful, but
WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public
License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE
file
that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
License
version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA
94065
USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or
have any
* questions.
*/

/*
* Portions Copyright (c) 2012 IBM Corporation
*/


import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
import java.io.PrintStream;
import java.util.Locale;
import sun.security.tools.JarSigner;

public class bug7163483 {

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
final String[] arg = { "-verify", "-verbose",
System.getProperty("java.home")+"/lib/jce.jar"};

ByteArrayOutputStream stream = new
ByteArrayOutputStream(1024*64);
PrintStream out = new PrintStream(stream);
System.setOut(out);

Locale.setDefault(Locale.GERMAN);
JarSigner js = new JarSigner();
js.run(arg);

out.flush();
String s1 = stream.toString();
s1 = s1.substring(0, s1.length()/2);
stream.reset();

Locale.setDefault(Locale.FRANCE);
js = new JarSigner();
js.run(arg);

out.flush();
String s2 = stream.toString();
s2 = s2.substring(0, s2.length()/2);

if (s1.equals(s2)) {
System.err.println("Header output for GERMAN locale is:"+s1);
System.err.println("Header output for FRANCE locale is:"+s2);
throw new RuntimeException(
"JarSigner verbose outputs are the same after setting
locale!!");
} else {
System.err.println("Header output for GERMAN locale is:"+s1);
System.err.println("Header output for FRANCE locale is:"+s2);
System.err.println("Test passed!");
}
}
}

Thanks and best regards!
- Jonathan Lu



Best regards!
- Jonathan


Thanks & regards!
- Jonathan



Thanks
- Jonathan










Reply via email to