looks fine alan On Oct 11, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > This is a follow-on from yesterday's mail on deprecating the LogManager's > add/removePropertyChangeListener methods. The other 4 problematic methods > identified in JEP 162 [1] are the same name methods on Pack200.Packer and > Pack200.Unpacker. The webrev to deprecate these methods is here: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8000362/webrev/ > > As with the LogManager methods, Mandy Chung searched >20000 projects. In this > case we didn't find any usages of these methods and this gives us confidence > that these methods are rarely used. We don't propose to provide a replacement > for these methods but instead just include wording to suggest that > applications poll the value of the progress property if they really need to > provide some progress indication. > > Kumar is the pack200 guru here and I know he's busy/away at the moment so I > plan to hold onto this patch until I at least hear from him. > > -Alan. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/162
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 lance.ander...@oracle.com
