On Nov 15, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 15/11/2012 12:19, Nils Loodin wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nloodin/exception-tracing/webrev.01/
>>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8003322
>>> Nils - you can explain why the byte code instrumentation can't be used
>>> here?
>> 
>> No real reason it couldn't, I just hadn't implemented it that way for 
>> simplicity's sake.
> I think it would be great if you could explore that. I think it would be a 
> lot preferable than using invasive instrumentation as proposed. Also it would 
> eliminate any concerns about stack overflow and whether this is a supported 
> interface or not.
> 

I second that. Where possible we should strive to be B/DTrace-like in the 
approach to instrumentation.

Paul.

Reply via email to