On 20/11/2012 14:10, Staffan Larsen wrote:
:
The original plan was for the code in this review to go into both 8 and 7u12.
Since 7u12 has a tighter deadline, a possible path would be to include it only
in 7u12, but not in 8. For 8 we would then implement a fully dynamic solution.
The only thing needed in 8 from this review would be the path field added to
the stream classes. Does that sound like a plan?
I think this is a good plan. I suggest bringing it up on jdk7u-dev so
that the jdk7u maintainers can think about the issue (rather that trying
to get approval at the last minute when you are reading to push).
-Alan
