On 12/14/2012 5:23 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
-classpath is the one inconsistent with others. We think that it
would be better to live with "-classpath" as people are familiar
with -classpath option.
Ah, I see. But then you should still use:
108 new Option(true, "-cp", "-classpath") {
Additionally, why not providing both, the old + new syntax:
108 new Option(true, "-cp", "-classpath", "--classpath") {
People are also still familiar with -version !
-Ulf
I guess I am against inconsistent use of the GNU option pattern. It is
bad enough that we have to have different tools with different
standards, but if we're going to a more GNU like pattern, we should
have a more consistent policy about how we mix these styles.
Inconsistently adopting GNU style is in my opinion worse than not
adopting it.
Having a second thought, it's a new tool and we need to learn its
options anyway. I'd opt for consistency than familiarity and not to
have mixture of Unix-style and GNU-style options. If no objection, I
will change it to --classpath for the initial push.
Mandy