Thank you again for the feedback Ulf On Feb 5, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Am 06.02.2013 00:54, schrieb Lance Andersen - Oracle: >> >> I can change that text and will do so before i put back. > > fine! I am going to change the message from "readObject not implemented" to "method readObject(Class<T>) not implemented" As it was suggested to make it stand out from the other readObject method from another reviewer. I am just going to make the change then push later today > >>> Have you observed internal review ID of 2426775? >> I have not seen this come through as of yet but will let you know when I do. > > It was from 16.01.2013 15:19 +0100 That was for your comment with the SQLInput/OuputImpl classes: ... and starting idx by 0 instead -1 would not be so exotic I have not seen the issue in our internal tracking system (but have not gone looking for it either). And as I mentioned in my response to your suggestion, I will look at this after I wrap up other work for JDBC 4.2 and RowSet 1.2 Best Lance > > > -Ulf >
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 [email protected]
