Is there something we can do to push it forward? Maybe a patch, tests, text, or something else?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Hildeberto Mendonça <m...@hildeberto.com>wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Vitaly Davidovich <vita...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> It should be isEmpty() -- empty() is usually for returning empty versions >> of the class. isEmpty is also consistent with String. >> > > Yes. Also, being consistent with String helps to reduce effort during > refactoring. > > -- > Hildeberto Mendonça, Ph.D > Blog: http://www.hildeberto.com > Twitter: https://twitter.com/htmfilho <http://www.cejug.org> -- Hildeberto Mendonça, Ph.D Blog: http://www.hildeberto.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/htmfilho <http://www.cejug.org>
