On Feb 11, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Krystal Mo <[email protected]> wrote:
> This might look a bit hacky... > > The idea is, DirectMethodHandle.make(Class<?> receiver, MemberName member) > should keep its behavior as it used to P.S. I wonder if we could get rid of that old overloading of DirectMethodHandle.make. I can see how it make Chris raise his eyebrows.
