Any other comments on this one, or is it good to go?
On 02/15/13 16:48, Joe Darcy wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I'll approve this change as-is, but I'd prefer if the test were written > in the style of using annotations to record the expected value. > > Cheers, > > -Joe > > On 2/15/2013 12:23 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please review this simple patch, which re-enables the JDK end-to-end >> tests for parameter reflection. >> >> It also fixes a small error in toString >> >> The webrev is here >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8008312/ >> >> Thanks, >> Eric >
