On 19 Feb 2013, at 18:35, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 19/02/2013 17:48, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> : >> >> Taking a look at this, I don't see any reason why we can't simply do >> (while maintaining serialization compatibility): > Right, it's not needed and I think we had Chris persuaded on this a few weeks > ago. It does change the serialized form but that it's not an issue issue and > it doesn't matter that they have the default value when deserialized on an > older release. Agreed, but we do need to have this approved by the CCC. I'll follow up on this. -Chris > > -Alan.
