On Mar 21, 10:10am, [email protected] (Martin Buchholz) wrote: -- Subject: Re: RFR-8008118
| Please revert this formatting change:
|
| - for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++)
| - ;
| + for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++);
| +
|
Stylistically I prefer:
for (q = p; (*q != ':') && (*q != '\0'); q++)
continue;
so that re-formatting accidents don't happen, and the intent is clearly
communicated.
christos
