On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Mark Sheppard <mark.shepp...@oracle.com>wrote:
> Hi Martin, > are there any concerns that the string literal "." might be on the stack > and not in data segment or heap? > Nope. > > Also, is it assured that the returned parentPathv will never be > de-allocated? I don't see parentPathv exposed beyond ** > that of UNIXProcess_md.c, at least not directly. > It is not visible anywhere else. It's "permanently" allocated. Those of you thinking about shutting down and restarting a JVM within the same process will cringe - this is one of many "little leaks" in such an unsupported scenario.
