On 15/04/2013 17:32, Martin Buchholz wrote:
This looks good, in that it fixes the flakiness.

Thanks Martin.

I don't think we have tests yet that ensure Either completion when only
one task completes.
Consider writing one normal async supplier and one that waits on a
latch; ensure that the Either future completes with the normal value,
then trip the latch to allow the second one to finish.

Great idea. Here you go:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8012237/webrev.01/webrev/test/java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture/Basic.java.udiff.html

-Chris.



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com
<mailto:chris.hega...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    I missed three cases in the previous change [1]. That will teach me
    for working on the weekend ;-)

    A full audit of the use of the XxxEitherXxx methods in the test has
    been done, and there are still three particular checks that are
    possibly incorrect. The failure is not always seen as this is racy code.

    
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~__chegar/8012237/webrev.00/__webrev/test/java/util/__concurrent/CompletableFuture/__Basic.java.udiff.html
    
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8012237/webrev.00/webrev/test/java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture/Basic.java.udiff.html>

    Thanks,
    -Chris.

    [1]
    
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/__pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-__April/016013.html
    
<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-April/016013.html>


Reply via email to