Hello,

We are at long last soon to commence our long overdue effort to integrate this 
important submission.

To this end I have a couple of questions and a comment below.

Thanks,

Brian

On Mar 10, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Tim Buktu wrote:

> I have updated the patch. It now contains Alan Eliasen's fast square() and 
> pow() implementations.
> Special characters have been replaced with ASCII ones.
> 
> Also included is a patched MutableBigInteger which uses the fast division 
> algorithm in BigInteger, and a patched BigDecimal which uses the fast 
> BigInteger.pow() method. Both changes speed up BigDecimal division.
> BigDecimal division is still much slower than BigInteger division (except 
> BigDecimal.divideAndRound) because it calls doRound(), setScale(), and 
> bigMultiplyPowerTen() which are pretty slow. Maybe these
> methods can be made more efficient.
> 
> To view the four patched files (#4 is BigIntegerTest.java) on one page, go to
> 
> https://gist.github.com/tbuktu/1576025 ,
> 
> or get them individually at
> 
> https://gist.github.com/tbuktu/1576025/raw/96e9dfd9261862223aa9ff81618f1d85045e85a5/BigInteger.java
> https://gist.github.com/tbuktu/1576025/raw/447db955ef74b065b03b0b45abd443cea5d7b2c6/MutableBigInteger.java
> https://gist.github.com/tbuktu/1576025/raw/6863a38032835b48b73cbce5aa833680c881557f/BigDecimal.java
> https://gist.github.com/tbuktu/1576025/raw/11977be7d001e093baa915b4370f326e30218eec/BigIntegerTest.java

This patch differs from the code in https://github.com/tbuktu/bigint.git. 
Notably I observed that Schonhage-Strassen multiplication and Barrett division 
are not present. Is this intentional and if so why would that be? Are the 
implementations of these additional algorithms not quite ready for contribution 
or is there a licensing issue perhaps?

> Semi-related: I think there is a bug in
> jdk/test/java/math/BigInteger/CompareToTests.java and
> jdk/test/java/math/BigDecimal/CompareToTests.java. It prints failures
> (with or without my patches) but the overall test doesn't fail.

I have taken note of this with the intent of investigating it in the course of 
evaluating this submission.

Reply via email to