On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Mike Duigou <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > > I had failed to notice that you were using 6813523 in your changeset. > Since 6792262 is more specific can we switch to using that one? > > Done.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Mike Duigou <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > > I had failed to notice that you were using 6813523 in your changeset. > Since 6792262 is more specific can we switch to using that one? > > Done.