On 30/05/2013 17:52, huizhe wang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
This looks good. Thanks again for the extra effort to keep JDK7 updated.
-Joe
This looks okay to me too.
BTW: One suggestios for these backports that require small adjustments
to what is in jdk8, is to include jdk7u-dev on the review request. That
way you can get the approvals in parallel (I think the jdk7u-dev
maintainers will regularly "okay" a change pending conclusion of the
code review. Also they will regularly approve changes when the small
difference to the jdk8 patch is pointed out).
-Alan