Thanks all, putting the changes in.
On 06/03/13 06:07, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 01/06/2013 13:32, Eric McCorkle wrote: >> Thanks, Kumar. Do I have a second? >> > For the jdk repository then only one reviewer is required although in > specialized or complicated areas then having a reviewer that knows the > area well is important. In this case I think you are good to go. > > Just on Kumar's comment then I think a lot of the shell tests start with > "#!" already so I would expect that scripts that check or fix-up > copyright headers should be able to deal with this already. Another > point, and maybe this for follow-on work, is that many of the shell > tests don't have anything so it would be good to fix them up too. We > should of course keep an eye out for opportunities to replace the shell > tests as our ultimate goal should be to get rid of them. > > -Alan. >
