On 7/15/2013 4:14 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Mandy,
Looks fine to me. I agree that we should back it out for 7u40. I
would think we want to leave the change in jdk8 and continue the
investigation and resolving the JCK failures for jdk8. Is that what
you are thinking? If so, we don't need to back it out from jdk8.
I was hoping to back out the fix for both jdk7u40 and jdk8. The setup
to reproduce is quite simple (modify package list in java.security)
and I think it's not necessary to have JCK failures in jdk8 for the
short to medium term as a result.
That's fine. Thanks. I see our concern of fixing 8000450 might take
longer time.
Mandy
