Mandy is just back from vacation and might not have got to your mail
yet. However it's not clear to me that there is an actual problem as it
looks like you've just ended up with two heads, maybe a hg fetch when
you had changes where you forgot to merge? As I understand, the hg
server is setup to limit the heads to 1 so it's not possible for any of
us to push changes that would result in a new head. Maybe start with a
fresh clone of jdk8/tl or jdk8/jdk8?
-Alan.
On 14/08/2013 10:19, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi all,
could somebody take care of the missing merge for the fix below?
Thanks,
Thomas
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Thomas Schatzl<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Missing merge for 8014890: Reference queues may return more
entries than expected
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:47:30 +0200
Hi Mandy,
while checking out latest sources, I saw that the commit for that
patch has not been merged to the default branch in the repository. It
represents its own head.
Could you fix this?
Here's the relevant hg output:
$ hg heads
changeset: 7764:8ed8e2b4b90e
tag: tip
parent: 7763:0741b19835b0
parent: 7692:b52a2ecdb803
user: lana
date: Tue Aug 06 10:10:39 2013 -0700
summary: Merge
changeset: 7605:2c04ce2f782c
user: mchung
date: Mon Jul 08 14:05:59 2013 +0200
summary: 8014890: (ref) Reference queues may return more entries
than expected
