On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:44 PM, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:
> Is it reasonable to make specification clearer ?
>
> Either to return JLS 1 specification:
> <<<
> The result is rounded to an integer by adding , taking the floor of the
> result, and casting the result to type long.
> >>>
This verbiage would imply no change to the implementation with the odd ULP
unity cases continuing to exhibit the problem described in the issue.
> or to replace "rounding up" with "rounding to positive infinity":
> <<<
> Returns the closest {@code int} to the argument, with ties rounding to
> positive infinity.
> >>>
This change could accompany the implementation change I posted in the updated
webrev.
Thanks,
Brian
