On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > >>> Nit: In the test there are a few places where you have t on a line by >>> itself: >>> >>> 65 t); >>> >>> but it can go on the previous line and not exceed the length of other lines >>> nearby. Also "+ should be " + >> >> I don't see what you are referring to. > > Oh, sorry, now I do. Will update.
I hope that as of now all nits have been picked. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/7179567/webrev.5/ Thanks, Brian
