Thank you for confirm.
And yes, removed.

Thanks,
Amy

On 11/7/13 6:36 PM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hi Amy,
This test is currently fixed and working as expected, but I have a desire to remove this test. In fact, this test (and my decision to fix and exclude it) already brings too many question, it doesn't do any helpful testing and all situation with adding fixed test to ProblemsList.txt looks awkward. I planned to remove it as part of JDK-8025051, but it will be resolved only in next 1-2 weeks. So, I suggest to exclude it from problems list and remove it now.

Thank you,
Aleksej

On 11/07/2013 08:29 AM, Amy Lu wrote:

On 11/6/13 10:45 AM, Amy Lu wrote:
On 11/5/13 7:09 PM, Amy Lu wrote:
On 11/5/13 6:01 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 05/11/2013 09:26, Amy Lu wrote:
:

Please review ProblemList.txt changes:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5812451/yl153753/8027822/webrev/index.html
This looks okay to me although I'm not sure about sun/util/resources/TimeZone/Bug6317929.java (for some reason Aleksej fixed the test and also excluded it, pending a decision/discussion on whether this test should be removed).

Aleksej,

Should this test be removed from ProblemList?

Thanks,
Amy


Should we use the opportunity to add all the tests that are failing due to the exact math intrinsic (JDK-8027622)?

-Alan.

Added 8027622 and affected tests into ProblemList:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5812451/yl153753/8027822/webrev.01/index.html

Thanks,
Amy

If it's pending decision on whether sun/util/resources/TimeZone/Bug6317929.java should be removed, maybe it can be updated in separate change.

I'm adding it back to ProblemList and here's the updated changes:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5812451/yl153753/8027822/webrev.02/index.html

Thanks,
Amy



Reply via email to