To keep things clear and obvious in the bug report, I pushed this under a new 
bug number, 8029348. You should update 6933803, including a summary of the 
details in this thread. 

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5bcaf730ceb8

Thanks,
-Chris.

On 26 Nov 2013, at 15:47, Tristan Yan wrote:

> Thank you. Chris.
> Tristan
> 
> On 11/26/2013 11:16 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Tristan,
>> 
>> The removal of this test from the ProblemList.txt looks like the right thing 
>> to do. I can push this for you.
>> 
>> -Chris.
>> 
>> On 26 Nov 2013, at 12:47, Tristan Yan wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Alan
>>> Could you sponsor this small change for me if you're ok with this change.
>>> Thank you very much.
>>> Tristan
>>> 
>>> On 11/20/2013 12:45 PM, Tristan Yan wrote:
>>>> Hi Everyone
>>>> 
>>>> We have a test  
>>>> java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor/CoreThreadTimeOut.java that was 
>>>> put into ProblemList because of bug JDK-6933803, this test has been fixed 
>>>> in 
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/diff/cb3ecb5e4ce5/test/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor/CoreThreadTimeOut.java.
>>>>  We have run a 1000 times loop test for making sure there is no issue in 
>>>> this test anymore and we don't see any failure . I think it's good time to 
>>>> bring this test back from ProblemList.
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ewang/tristan/JDK-6933803/webrev.00/test/ProblemList.txt.sdiff.html
>>>>  
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eewang/tristan/JDK-6933803/webrev.00/test/ProblemList.txt.sdiff.html>
>>>> 
>>>> Please let me know if you have comment on this.
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> /Tristan Yan(Haibo Yan)/
> 

Reply via email to