Hi Serge
This looks OK. For --- old/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.587885460 +0000 +++ new/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.435885464 +0000 Please remove the following -------------------- Package Specification • Specification of the JDBC 4.0 API Related Documentation • Getting Started--overviews of the major interfaces • Chapters on the JDBC API--from the online version of The Java Tutorial Continued • JDBCTMAPI Tutorial and Reference, Third Edition-- a complete reference and tutorial for the JDBC 3.0 API ---------------- The above links keep breaking now that we are off of java.sun.com And I agree with roger, please use <br> Alan, yes I can look to clean up some of the formatting crud for Java SE 9 once we have access to the workspace Thank you for doing this Serge. Best Lance On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 05/12/2013 17:25, Serge wrote: >> Hi all, >> please review the fix >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/ >> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/> >> for >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712 >> >> This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do >> not affect the appearance of the documentation. > The removal of the <p> tags seems okay. The only thing that I'm not sure > about the addition of <br/> to the package docs (is that needed?). > > Lance - while scanning this patch then it appears that some of the formatting > in the javadoc comments is all over the place (java.sql.Connection is one > example). It might be good to clean that up once the jdk9 project is open for > business. > > -Alan >
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 lance.ander...@oracle.com