On Jan 10, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > The implementation changes look good. I agree that the javadoc needs changing > as it's otherwise misleading as to what the implementation actually does. I > would think that this should go with the implementation change rather than as > a separate change. >
See here for patch layered on top of code changes (to be folded after review into one patch): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8030848-Collections-sort-docs/webrev/ Paul.