On Jan 10, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
> The implementation changes look good. I agree that the javadoc needs changing 
> as it's otherwise misleading as to what the implementation actually does. I 
> would think that this should go with the implementation change rather than as 
> a separate change.
> 

See here for patch layered on top of code changes (to be folded after review 
into one patch):

  
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8030848-Collections-sort-docs/webrev/

Paul.

Reply via email to